Parliament’s ad hoc committee probing allegations of police corruption has decided to move ahead with a subpoena for North West businessman Oupa Brown Mogotsi after he refused to appear before it.

Why Parliament wants Mogotsi in the Room

Mogotsi is seen as a key witness in the committee’s work, with MPs trying to test claims and evidence linked to alleged corruption in policing. He has previously testified at the Madlanga Commission, which has kept his name in the public spotlight.

The committee met in Cape Town, at the Good Hope Chambers, where frustration has been building over repeated refusals or delays by high-profile individuals expected to assist the inquiry.

The Security Demands Stalling the Hearing

At the centre of the standoff is Mogotsi’s insistence on a private security detail of his own choice, paid for by Parliament for seven days.

Committee secretary Vhonani Ramaano told MPs that Parliament had explored security arrangements, including escorts once Mogotsi arrived in Cape Town. Mogotsi rejected that option, saying he did not want protection from people he does not know.

Ramaano also said Mogotsi would not provide personal details needed to finalise travel and accommodation while his security demands were unresolved.

Subpoena Process and What Comes Next

Chairperson Lekganyane said the committee had resolved to subpoena Mogotsi after he refused to testify as scheduled. MPs argued the committee’s authority cannot be negotiated through conditions.

The committee has also indicated that formal steps still depend on the Speaker’s sign-off, which is expected within days.

Wider Inquiry and Witness Pressure

The committee was also expecting input this week from private forensic investigator Paul O’Sullivan, but he declined to testify in person, citing safety concerns.

With limited time left to complete its work, MPs are pushing harder for decisive action when witnesses refuse to cooperate or repeatedly fail to show.