North West businessman Oupa Brown Mogotsi testified before Parliament's ad hoc committee on police corruption on 23 February 2026. He defended his long-term role as a crime intelligence informant and agent, clashing with members over operational details and lack of documentation. This Brown Mogotsi testimony police corruption revealed tensions between undercover realities and formal expectations.

Mogotsi stressed the dangers of his work, warning that sharing too much could prove fatal. He accused figures like the KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner of hidden ties. The session underscored ongoing probes into criminal justice system integrity.

Details of Mogotsi's Testimony

Mogotsi explained his involvement with crime intelligence since 1999, first as an informant and later as an agent. He differentiated informants, who provide leads after arrests, from agents, who build relationships with handlers. Mogotsi used Section 252A of the Criminal Procedure Act for undercover operations, gaining exemptions from liability.

Evidence leader advocate Maria Mokhaoetsi questioned his credibility due to absent records. Mogotsi argued documentation would endanger lives. He stated handlers alone manage agent details, with no KPIs for operatives.

Committee member Dereleen James of ActionSA challenged his knowledge of national police instructions. She asserted informants provide information, not recruit others. This Brown Mogotsi testimony police corruption exchange highlighted differing views on roles.

Background on Mogotsi and the Committee

Mogotsi owns liquor outlets, a meat supply business, and catering services, all private. He previously testified at the Madlanga Commission in November 2025, making similar claims. There, he accused the Zulu royal family of CIA links and Lt Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi of secret ties to Vusimuzi "Cat" Matlala.

The ad hoc committee probes allegations by Mkhwanazi of corruption in the criminal justice system. Mogotsi initially sought virtual testimony for security reasons but appeared in person after a subpoena.

Parliament rejected his demands for funded private security. This Brown Mogotsi testimony police corruption follows weeks of delays. Mogotsi described himself as a layman guided by handlers, not laws.

Reactions from Committee Members

James fumed that Mogotsi acted like a SAPS member, recruiting without authority. Mogotsi responded, "The honourable member and myself, we are in two different worlds." He offered to provide handler corroboration without names.

Mokhaoetsi probed whether his accounts were firsthand or hearsay. Mogotsi admitted some involvement off-site. Committee members planned further questioning after 3pm on 23 February 2026.

No immediate responses came from SAPS or Mkhwanazi; Newsroom contacted them on 24 February 2026 but received none. Analysts note this Brown Mogotsi testimony police corruption could impact ongoing anti-corruption efforts.