A witness at the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry on Wednesday told the panel that political pressure influenced the arrest of controversial blogger Musa Khawula. The testimony suggests his arrest was not just a legal matter but tied to posts that accused powerful figures of wrongdoing.

Witness F said suspended Deputy National Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya instructed police to act on an outstanding warrant and to share it with private security linked to suspected cartel figure Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala. The witness understood this came after pressure from Deputy Police Minister Cassel Mathale’s office.

What Triggered the Arrest

Khawula’s social media posts in May 2025 made explosive allegations against Nozuko Mbalula (wife of ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula) and her business partner over alleged corrupt tender dealings. After those posts, a Crimen injuria and Cybercrime Act warrant was issued and executed while he appeared in court on unrelated charges.

The commission heard that Matlala was given the arrest warrant and helped locate Khawula because his security company knew the blogger’s movements. Messages show Matlala responding with “Asbonge” after receiving the warrant, raising eyebrows about police procedure.

Political Influence or Law in Action?

According to the witness testimony, pressure came from Mathale’s office to ensure Khawula was arrested after he publicly insulted an ANC heavyweight. The evidence leader at the commission, Advocate Matthew Chaskalson SC, drew a direct link between political offices and the urgency of the arrest.

Khawula has a history of legal trouble beyond these posts, including contempt of court over defamation orders and other pending charges. Courts have previously ruled his content unlawful, separate from the commission’s focus on how the arrest unfolded.

Broader Issues at Play

This testimony feeds into broader concerns raised at the commission about political interference, law enforcement capture, and criminal networks influencing police decisions. It highlights the blurred lines between online speech, defamation law and political power in South Africa.

The Madlanga Commission continues to probe these claims as it seeks to untangle alleged abuse of authority and protect the integrity of the justice system.