A Nigerian activist has sharply criticised anti-migrant group March and March, calling it a “tribal vigilante group” amid rising tension over immigration protests in South Africa. The remarks add another layer to an already heated debate over undocumented migration, crime and the treatment of foreign nationals.

The criticism comes as protests linked to immigration continue to stir anger both inside South Africa and across the continent. March and March has become one of the most visible groups pushing for tougher action against undocumented foreign nationals, often framing its demands around crime, public services and jobs.

Fallout from anti-migrant protests grows

The group has taken part in high-profile protests in recent weeks, joining broader calls for stricter immigration controls, tighter visa rules and tougher enforcement against undocumented migrants. But critics say the tone and conduct of some of these protests have deepened fear among migrant communities and encouraged hostility rather than lawful debate.

The Nigerian activist’s comments reflect growing unease among foreign nationals who say anti-migrant activism in South Africa is increasingly crossing the line from political protest into intimidation. That concern has become more visible as several African governments have publicly raised alarm over the safety of their citizens in the country.

Migration debate becomes more combustible

South Africa’s immigration debate is not new, but it has become more combustible as unemployment, service delivery frustration and crime fears continue to shape public anger. Groups like March and March argue that government has failed to manage undocumented migration properly and that communities are paying the price.

At the same time, critics warn that these grievances are being expressed in ways that can stigmatise entire communities and inflame tensions on the ground. That is why language now matters so much. Calling a movement “vigilante” is not just an insult. It is a warning that protest may be hardening into something more dangerous.

Pressure builds on government to act

The controversy leaves government under pressure from both sides. On one side are communities demanding tighter immigration enforcement. On the other are migrant groups, activists and foreign governments insisting that South Africa must protect foreign nationals from intimidation and violence.

For now, the activist’s remarks capture how toxic the atmosphere has become. What should be a difficult but lawful policy debate is increasingly being described in the language of fear, threat and confrontation. That is a sign that South Africa’s migration crisis is no longer only about borders. It is also about whether public anger can still be contained within the rule of law.